SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(J&K) 312

T.S.DOABIA
Darshan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Surinder Kour
Advocate For Respondent: Sandeep Singh

1. Primary hypertension was found to be the disease which led to the petitioner being boarded out of service. The matter was referred to the Controller of Defence Accounts That office has come to the conclusion that the disease in question is constitutional in nature and therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to disability pension. In this regard, it would be apt to refer to the stand taken by the respondents It is stated in para 3 of the objections that, during the year 1991 when the petitioner was with the Army Clerk Training School Aurangabad and was Naib Subedar at that time the Medical Authorities during routine Medical Examination detected that the petitioner was case of hypertension. Immediately thereafter the petitioner was admitted in the Military Hospital Aurangabad on 16.3.1991 and was placed in the Medical Category CEE Temporary petitioner was given the required treatment. The petitioner was ultimately discharged from service in Dec™98. The case of the petitioner for sanctioning disability pension was sent to the Chief Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension), Allahabad but it is that office which has rejected the pension claims of the petitioner. The reasons given,


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top