1. Petitioner is aggrieved of the fact that grading which was given to him by an officer who was to write his Annual Confidential Report were changed by the reviewing authority and in doing so his performance has been brought down as compared with his previous assessment years. What is stated in paras 6 and 7 of the petitioner is a material for the disposal of this writ petition. These paras as reproduced below:

6. That in the year 1981 the petitioner earned 4 points in his ACR and in the year 1982 the petitioner earned 3 points and in year 1983 the petitioner earned 4 points and in the year 1984 the petitioner has been awarded 3 points. The petitioner has disputed the points awarded for the year 1984 and 1985 on very substantial grounds.

7. That the ACRs for the year 1984 were properly initiated and the initiating office has awarded 4 points on the basis of the performance of the petitioner and the Reviewing Officer, without any pen-picture, has reduced 4 points to 3 points which have been disputed by the petitioner as the same has been done by the Reviewing Officer (Respondent No. 4) in violation of the standing instructions and provisions contained in the Army Headquarters letter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document