SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(J&K) 44

K.V.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR
Khazir Bhat – Appellant
Versus
Ahmad Dar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: J.L. Chowdhry
Advocate For Respondent: G.M. Wani

ORDER: The petitioners who are plaintiffs in a partition suit have come up in revision under S. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to canvass the correctness of the decision of the District Judge at Srinagar who, on appeal, remanded the suit to the trial court for fresh disposal in the light of the observations made by him in his judgment and according to law.

(2) The parties are Muslims governed by Mohammedan Law. The plaintiffs-petitioners brought the suit for partition in the court of the Munsiff at Srinagar alleging that they are entitled to certain specified shares in the suit property as heirs under the Mohammedan Law. The defendants who are the other heirs admitted that they and the plaintiffs .are entitled to the property in suit as co-heirs, but contended that the entire property available for partition was not shown in the plaint and that the suit was consequently incompetent, being one for partial partition. The defendants also specifically mentioned in their written statement the other property which the plaintiffs ought to have included in their plaint and which also ought to be partitioned between the parties.

(3) The trial court as well as the appellate court (District





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top