S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Duni Chand – Appellant
Versus
Bimla Devi – Respondent
(2) A criminal case of theft was instituted against Saukun and Charan Das and the two accused were ultimately convicted by a Magistrate of Ramnagar. The learned Magistrate after convicting the accused directed that the ornaments recovered should be handed over to the complainant, the petitioner in this case. The accused then appealed to the Sessions Judge against their conviction and the appeal was allowed and the accused were acquitted. The learned Judge came to a clear finding that the case was false and that the complainant had not proved that the ornaments were stolen properties and as a consequential order the learned Judge directed that the ornaments should be returned to Mst. Bimla Devi from whom they were seized.
(3) In support of this petition Mr. Sharma contended that the order of restoration of the propertes _ to Bimla Devi was passed without giving a notice to the complainant who is undoubtedly aggrieved by this order. He has further submitted that there
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.