SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(J&K) 8

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Duni Chand – Appellant
Versus
Bimla Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Lok Nath Sharma
Advocate For Respondent: Ranuq Singh

This is an application in revision against that part of the order of Sessions Judge, Jammu, by which he has directed the ornaments to be restored to Mst. Bimla Devi. The application arises in the following circumstances:

(2) A criminal case of theft was instituted against Saukun and Charan Das and the two accused were ultimately convicted by a Magistrate of Ramnagar. The learned Magistrate after convicting the accused directed that the ornaments recovered should be handed over to the complainant, the petitioner in this case. The accused then appealed to the Sessions Judge against their conviction and the appeal was allowed and the accused were acquitted. The learned Judge came to a clear finding that the case was false and that the complainant had not proved that the ornaments were stolen properties and as a consequential order the learned Judge directed that the ornaments should be returned to Mst. Bimla Devi from whom they were seized.

(3) In support of this petition Mr. Sharma contended that the order of restoration of the propertes _ to Bimla Devi was passed without giving a notice to the complainant who is undoubtedly aggrieved by this order. He has further submitted that there







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top