SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(J&K) 110

M.L.BHAT
Munshi – Appellant
Versus
Hari Chand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: S.A. Salaria
Advocate For Respondent: R.S. Thakur

1. This is plaintiffs second appeal against the judgment and decree of courts below, Prayer is made for setting aside the findings of courts below which are against the provisions of Law.

2. To appreciate the controversy, it is necessary to give a brief resume of facts.

3. Plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for recovery of land which he had mortgaged to the other side. The suit was filed as early as on 28-2-1973 in the Munsiffs court at Basholi. It was averred in the plaint that I/3rd share of 184 knals and 8 marlas 5 was mortgaged for Rs. 300/- and a mutation was attested in favour of the mortgagee on 15th Kartik 1970 Bk. The plainttff is said to have paid Rs.75/- to defendant No.l and was ready to pay Rs.225/- to defendants 2 to 4. On payment of the said amount he was entitled to recover the possession of the said land.

4. The defendants in their written statement have admitted that they are the mortgagees of the suit land which was mortgaged to them for Rs 300/- on 11th Magh 1967 Bk. and possession was delivered to them in Rahbi 1968 Bk. They have relied on a copy of mutation which is attached with the written statement. They raised the defence that the plaintiffs right to redeem



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top