MIAN JALAL-UD-DIN
Khurshid Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Bashir Ahmad – Respondent
2. On an application made by the present respondents under Sections 1 and 3 of the Act that Kh. Mohd. Maqbool the decreased had left huge movable and improperly and that the respondents were his heirs and that the present petitioners before this court were misappropriating the property changing its condition and intending to forcibly deprive the respondents from enjoying the fruits of inheritance, the learned District Judge after recording his satisfaction that there were strong grounds for proceeding and determining the rights summarily under the Act issued notices to the petitioners, and with a view to preserve the property from being misappropriated appointed a curator under Section 4 of the Act. The petitioners appeared before the District Judge and by means of a petition challenged the jurisdiction of the court to take cognizance of the matter. The application was disposed of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.