SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(J&K) 99

R.P.SETHI
Shanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: N.P. Kotwal
Advocate For Respondent: Satish Grover
Advocate For Respondent: Anil Mahajan

1. Upon a report filed by the husband of the petitioner FIR No, 3 of 1986 for the commission of offence under section 382 RFC was registered with the police station Gandhinagar. During the course of investigation of the case, the vehicle No, 9677 JKQ was seized by the police concerned. Upon an application filed by the husband of the petitioner for the release of the vehicle, the learned Chief Judl. Magistrate, Jammu ordered that vehicle be kept on the superdnama of Ramesh Chander respondent No. 2 herein with a further direction to the police to complete the investigation and find as to whether the vehicle had actually been sold to the petitioner Shanti Devi or not. The police was directed to submit the report before 23-1-1986. Shanti Devi was permitted to move an application for change of superdar in case she had any claim. A revision was preferred before the Addl, Sessions Judge, Jammu who vide his order dated 5-2-86 held the order in question as interlocatory order and the proceedings having been kept open by the trial court. The direction being in the order that the vehicle shall be produced before the court on 23-1-86 by the superdar, the order passed by the Chief Jud









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top