SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(J&K) 22

MIAN JALAL-UD-DIN
State – Appellant
Versus
Gh. Mohd. Raja – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: A.K. Malik
Advocate For Respondent: S.L. Koul

(1) This is a criminal reference and has been made by the learned Sessions Judge, Srinagar, recommending the quashing of the impugned order and directing, the trial court to proceed afresh in the case from the stage at which it closed the evidence of the prosecution.

(2) It appears that the police had challaned the accused respondents in the court of the 1st Addl, Munsiff Magistrate 1st class Srinagar under section 409 RPC. The court directed the prosecution to produce evidence on 29-4-1968 but on that date no witness was present and the case was adjourned to 13-5-1968, on that date too none of the prosecution witness was present and the case again postponed to 29-5-68. On that date as well the witnesses for prosecution were not present and the trial court gave one more opportunity to the prosecution to produce the evidence and adjourned the case to 18-6-1968. On this date 5 prosecution witnesses were examined and thereafter on 17-7-68 none of the prosecution witnesses was present and the case was adjourned to 29-7 1968. On this date the statements of 4 prosecution witnesses were recorded and the case was adjourned to 13-8-1968 On this date the court observed that as the remaining







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top