SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(J&K) 129

G.D.SHARMA
Thuru – Appellant
Versus
Rasal Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: J.S. Kotwal

The petitioner, Mst. Thuru, through the medium of this petition made under the provisions of Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, has sought a direction in the nature of writ of certiorari for quashing order dated 16-2-1993 passed by the learned Additional Commissioner (with powers of Divisional Commissioner) Jammu, whereby he in the second appeal before him has set aside mutation under No. 661 dated 18-9-1988 regarding inheritance of the estate of petitioners father, namely Fakiru, resident of Dhanore, Tehsil Kathua. The petitioner has sought a direction against respondent No. 6 to pay her the compensation for the use and occupation of the land comprised in Khasra No. 441, situate in village Dhanore, Tehsil Kathua.

2. The factual matrix of the case lies in a narrow compass and is to the effect that said Fakiru had no male issue and was survived by his three daughters. The petitioner herein even after her marriage, was living, with her father, namely, said Fakiru, and looked after him during his old age, Out of Jove and affection and for the services rendered by the petitioner said Fakiru on 22-7-1983 executed a registered will in favour of the petitioner in respect of his whole












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top