SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(J&K) 29

MIAN JALAL-UD-DIN
Kanshi Nath Pandit – Appellant
Versus
Omkar Nath Alias Avtar Krishen – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: S.T. Hussain
Advocate For Respondent: Harbans Singh

This is a reference made by the learned Sessions Judge Srinagar recommending that the order dated 10-5-1973 of (City Munsiff) Judicial Magistrate 1st Class Srinagar closing the prosecution evidence be quashed on the ground that it is improper and contrary to law.

2. It appears that in case State Vs. Omkar Nath and others pending trial in the court of City Munsiff Judicial Magistrate 1st Class under section 451 R.P.C. the Magistrate issued non-bailable warrants against one Dr. Maqbool P.W. in consequence of his non-appearance. On 19th April 1973 the said witness appeared with an application praying that the warrant or arrest issued against him be recalled. He undertook to present himself in the court on the next date of hearing i.e. 10-5-1973. The witness, however, did not appear on that date as a result of which the learned Magistrate closed the evidence of the prosecution. The learned Sessions Judge has in his reference observed that the order closing the evidence of the prosecution could not be sustained in view of the fact that once the court had issued process against the witness, it was the duty of the court to enforce his attendance and for that matter even to issue non-baila




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top