SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(J&K) 51

MIAN JALAL-UD-DIN
Devki Durrani – Appellant
Versus
Ab. Rashid Bakshi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Z.A. Shah
Advocate For Respondent: M.L. Bhat

1. This revision is directed against-the order dated 23-6-1978 of the District Judge, Srinagar, dismissing the application of the petitioners under Order 41 R. 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. Briefly speaking the facts of the case are that Abdul Rashid the respondent brought a suit for ejectment in respect of the suit premises against the three defendants namely Smt. Devki Durrani, Smt. Brij Mohani Durrani and Sh. Brij Lal Durrani describing them as his tenants. That suit has been decreed by the trial court. Against the judgment and decree of the trial court an appeal has been filed which is pending in the court of the District Judge, Srinagar. During the pendency of the appeal an application under order 41 R. 2 C. P. C. was filed by Shrimati Devki Durrani and Shrimati Brij Mohani Durrani in which they sought leave to raise additional grounds in the memo of appeal. The grounds sought to be raised are as follows: -

(1) That Shri B. L. Durrani defendant No. 3 is only an attorney holder of the appellants and at present is acting as Manager of the said property.

(2) The appellants are the tenants of the suit property and Mr. B. L. Durrani has wrongly been impleaded as one of the te




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top