This second appeal has been filed by the present appellant who was the plaintiff before the trial. He filled a suit in the Court of Sub Judge Poonch in Sept., 1990 against the present respondents stating therein that the respondent No,1 was his legally wedded wife. The marriage has been performed five years back. He also submitted that the marriage was entered into the register Nikah Khwani. He also alleged that at the time of marriage he executed an agreement that after the marriage he would reside in the house of respondent No. 2, his mother-in-law alongwith wife for four years as Khana Damad. He further submitted that he resided there and cohabited with his wife during that period. He submitted that as he had gone to his house, the respondents do not allow his wife respondent No.1 to live with him as his wife. Therefore, he sought a decree for restitution of conjugal right and also for perpetual injunction against the respondent other than respondent No.1 that they should not interfere in living together of respondent No.1 and the appellant. He also sought a decree that the respondent No. 1 should not married either to respondent No.3 or any other person.

Respondent No, 1 in her

Click Here to Read the rest of this document