SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(J&K) 7

M.RAMAKRISHNA, B.A.KHAN
Anamika Saraf – Appellant
Versus
University Of Jammu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: P.N. Goja

1. Anamika Saraf, the appellant, who was the petitioner in OWP No. 769/1994 has come up in appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing the above petition on 9.12.1994 for the reason set out in the said order.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the grounds taken in the appeal. A few facts which are relevant for purposes of disposal of this appeal are as follows:

3. It is now brought to the notice of the court that there are only two colleges imparting knowledge of law in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, and there had been so much rush for the admission of the students intending to enter into law college. There are no other private institutions in this area to cater the needs of such students as we find in other States.

4. The petitioners grievance before the learned Single Judge was that admittedly the cut off points for the admission to the current year 1994-95 for purpose of LL.B course was 1007, regard has being to the marks obtained by the candidates securing the marks in the academic course of degree examination qualifying themselves for becoming eligible for admission to Law College. That being so, the University of Jammu denied t















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top