SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(J&K) 108

NISAR AHMAD KAKRU
Mohd. Amin Mir – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant:Petitioner in Person
Advocate For Respondent: Anil Bhan

1. Through the medium of this writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of India, the petitioner, post and position wise a Driver, has challenged the order of dis-continuation issued against him by the Regional Director, Health and Family Welfare, J&K, Srinagar (Respondent No.3) vide his order bearing No: RHOS/419/96-Estt/1031-34 dated; 28/01/1997 (for short impugned order). The petition came up for final hearing on 8/4/1999 Respondents appeared through their counsel whereas the petitioner appeared in person and submitted that he belongs to class of have not and is financially so wreck that he could not keep the commitment of fee with his counsel and expressed his inability to provide assistance of an Advocate to the court. He canvassed that he has been victimised for extraneous considerations. Undoubtedly appealing events were brought to the notice of the court but the difficulty is that the court has to pass a verdict on the strength of the pleadings of the parties and it is not possible for me to determine the questions involved in the writ petition on the basis of a woeful tale revealed by the petitioner in the open court. He has further submitted that the alle























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top