A.M.MIR
Ramzan Bhat – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent
BRIEF FACTS: -
2. Land measuring 5-kanal 14marlas comprising of khasra No.21 9/1 88/5 of village Shankarpora was in cultivating possession of respondent No.4 in kharif 1971. He was recorded so even earlier to kharif 1971. Respondent No.3, while acting in terms of the Agrarian Reforms Act, (hereinafter called the Act), took stock of the spot position. Mutation in terms of sections 4 of the Act was attested by respondent No.3 in the name of respondent No.4 as prospective owner, amount of Rs. 4841. 38P.
3. Subsequently on payment of levy/vide passbook No. 1853/18 dated 14.7.1980, mutation under Sec.8 also was attested in favour of respondent No.4. The petitioner No.1, later, applied for resumption of the disputed land under Sec.7 of the Act. Resumption application was rejected on the ground that the ex-owner had sold some of his after 1971. The amount of levy was drawn and received by the writ petitioner No.1. Under Sec.8 of the Act full ownership rights got conferred upon respondent No.4. Afterward
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.