SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(J&K) 69

B.A.KHAN
Maya Ram – Appellant
Versus
Nanak Chand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: L.K. Sharma
Advocate For Respondent: R.S. Thakur

1. A suit for recovery of Rs. 2,500/- was instituted against the appellant way back in 1968. During the trial, one of the Plaintiffs-Battu Mal died in on about 8-6-1972. His two sons the other two plaintiffs, were on record and no further steps were taken by them to bring other legal representatives on record. The trial court vide order dated 12-7-1972 directed removal of deceased plaintiff from index and allowed the other two plaintiffs to continue the suit. The court decreed the suit on 17- -1974. In appeal, learned District Judge, Kathua remanded the suit to trial court to find out whether it had abated in terms of order XXII (3) of CPC, Upon this, plaintiffs filed an application on 20th May, 1976 for substitution as legal representatives and on a fresh consideration of the matter, the court held the suit to have abated as a whole after concluding that right to sue of surviving plaintiffs did not survive. Plaintiffs went in appeal against the District Judge reversed the judgment holding that right to sue of the other two plaintiffs had survived in the facts and circumstances of the case and directed the trial court to depose of the suit on merit. Hence, this appeal by appellant-












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top