SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(J&K) 41

V.K.GUPTA
Surekha Devi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Suresh Katyal
Advocate For Respondent: Seema Sheikher

The dispute in this petition, primarily and mainly revolves around the status of the petitioner as Anganwadi Worker in an ICDS approved scheme where functionaries in the projects run by the ICDS expenditure are posted in Anganwadis. Anganwadi worker is one of the functionaries posted and constituting the group of other functionaries working in an Anganvadi in either an urban or a rural project constituted under the ICDS scheme. The petitioner submits that she is a civil servant, protected under Article 311 of the Constitution of India therefore, once she got appointed on this post, her rights vested in her under Article 311 of the Constitution came to be operative and, therefore, her services cannot be terminated except in accordance with the procedure provided for and prescribed under the aforesaid Article. Respondents deny the petitioners claim and submit that she did not hold a civil post and that her appointment at best could be termed either as a honorary one or contractual basis and that it could be terminated without assigning any reason/or without following any procedure prescribed under law.

The facts are not disputed. The petitioner came to be appointed as an Anganwadi Wor
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top