1993 Supreme(J&K) 71
R.P.SETHI, A.Q.PARRAY
Qazi Yusra Aslam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.H. Beigh
Advocate For Appellant: J. Andrabi
Advocate For Appellant: M.S.A. Farooqi
Advocate For Appellant: M. Aijaz
Advocate For Appellant: M.Y. Siddiqi
Advocate For Appellant: Altaf Haqani
Advocate For Appellant: N.A. Ronga
Advocate For Appellant: Z.A. Qureshi
Advocate For Appellant: N.A. Baba
Advocate For Appellant: M.A. Khan
Advocate For Appellant: M.A. Wani
Advocate For Appellant: G.Q. Bhat
Advocate For Respondent: Bilal Nazki
Advocate For Respondent: B.M. Sadiq
1. Persistent defiance of the court directions and conferment of largeses upon the privileged few by the respondents are the main contentions required to be adjudicated upon by this court in these petitions which are directed against the selection and nomination of candidates to MBBS/BDS courses in the state medical colleges and colleges outside the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It has been noticed by this court and the Apex court on various occasions that the respondents have been making selection and nomination of candidates to the aforesaid courses without adopting the procedure already prescribed or directed to be followed as per directions of this court. Selection/ nomination to the professional courses have many a times invited wrath of the courts but without any positive effect upon the respondents particularly the competent authority entrusted with the job of making selection to the aforesaid courses. Persistent and consistent defiance of the court directions has created a sense of insecurity among the competing candidates in this strife torn state engulfed in the crisis of militancy for which the conduct and the manner of selection adopted by the respondents is stated to be
Click Here to Read the rest of this document