SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(J&K) 242

NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, S.K.GUPTA
Parveen Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: R.P Sangra
Advocate For Respondent: S.S. Nanda

1. Admitted.

2. Notice dated 20-12-1998 calling upon the appellant to demolish the unauthorised construction raised by him within seven days from the date of receipt of the notice was challenged before Jammu and Kashmir Special Tribunal, Jammu. It was pleaded that ten appellant had repaired his own old house located in Vinayak Bazar, after securing requisite permission from Jammu Municipality (respondent-3). It was further pleaded that the appellant has not committed breach of any provisions contained in the Jammu and Kashmir Municipal Act and, therefore, the notice calling upon him to remove the unauthorised construction was uncalled for it was further pleaded that the lane is almost covered with balconies constructed by the inhabitants and as such sought compounding of the case and setting aside of the impugned order.

3. The Tribunal, in order to ascertain the factual position existing on spot, visited the place and found that there were number of rooms without any provision for natural light and proper ventilation. That there was a large sign-board with words Hotel Basera written on it, fixed on the roof of the building. There was no kitchen normally found in the residential ho











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top