SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(J&K) 133

H.K.SEMA, B.L.BHAT
Manzoor Ahmad Sheikh & Ors – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.A. Ganai
Advocate For Respondent: M.I. Qadiri

1. This appeal has been preferred by six petitioners against the judgment and the order dated 29-6-1997 passed by learned single Judge in SWP No.817-22/ 1996, dismissing the writ petition.

2. This case has a chequerred history and the facts leading to the filing of the present appeal may be summarily recited.

3. Case of the petitioners as alleged in the writ petition is that the petitioners are working against following posts: -

a) Petitioners NO. 1 and 2 Teacher

b) Petitioners NO. 3 Jr. Assistant

c) Petitioners NO. 4 Peon

d) Petitioners NO. 5

Library Assistant

e) Petitioners NO. 6

Physical Education

Teacher.

4. It is stated that all of them are working in Government High School Larno, against vacant posts. Petitioners, however, did not annex any appointment orders appointing them to the particular post, instead the; petitioners annex Xerox copy of the certificate dated 10-4-1996 showing that the petitioners have been discharging their duties since the date of their joining and also certified that the pay and allowance from March 1995 to October 1995 have been drawn. The afore said certificate has been issued by the Headmaster of the High School Larnoo.

5. The grievances of the petitioners

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top