SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(J&K) 152

B.L.BHAT
Ram Krishan – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: A.H. Qazi
Advocate For Respondent: B.L. Kalgotra

1. This revision is directed against an order/judgment dated G.S. 2002 passed in 3/Appeal, titled Pawan Kumar vs. Ram Krishan, recorded by the learned District Judge Kathua.

2. The facts leading upto this revision are that the respondent Pawan Kumar came to institute a suit for declaration, with consequential relief of permanent injuction against the appellant-respondent before the Court of Munsiff, Hira Nagar. Alongside the said suit the respondent-plaintiff came to file an application for issuance of an interim injuction, wherein the learned Munsiff came to pass the impugned order, which reads as under: -

"Issue notice to the non-applicant to restrain from interfering in the suit land measuring 15 marlas comprising khasra No. 186 suited at village Dayala chak, in any manner including that by way of using the same as a passage. This order is, however, subject to objections from the other side. Put up on 30.4.2002 for objections by the non-applicant."

2. This order came to be challenged by the present petitioner, Ram Krishan, to defendant, before the learned District Judge Kathua in appeal, on 6.5.2002 and on the same day learned District Judge obstensibly came to dispose of the ap




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top