SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(J&K) 141

MUZAFFAR JAN, S.K.GUPTA
Harbaksh Singh (Dr. ) – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.K. Bhardwaj
Advocate For Respondent: K.S. Johal

1. We have heard Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, learned senior Advocate, along with Mr. Ajay Abrol, Advocate, representing the appellant as well as Mr. K.S. Johal, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. D.S. Thakur, advocate, appearing for the respondents, in extensor.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and other dated 27-2-2003 propiunded by learned Single Judge in SWP No. 433/2002, entitled Dr. Harbaksh Singh & others Versus State of J&K & others. By the aforesaid judgment and order, the learned Single Judge held that the admission of the petitioner to the MD Anaeshthesia was fraudulent and he was a party to the fraud, so cannot be permitted to say that he was entitled to hearing before his admission came to be cancelled and therefore, not entitled to any relief, and dismissed the writ petition with costs.

3. Facts relevant for the disposal of this letters patent appeal in resume may be noticed. After the issuance of the select list of the Entrance Examination for admission to various courses in the State of Jammu and Kashmir held on 31st December, 1995 and 1st January ,1996 unsuccessful candidates including the petitioner filed various writ petition to press their claim f








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top