QAZI MASUD HASAN
Mohd. Ibrahim – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
It would appear that the applicants were put on their trial for an offence under the Motor Vehicles Act and were convicted. Under section 17 of the Motor Vehicle Act all offences punishable under the Act are to be tried summarily. That section also provides the class of Magistrates that shall try such cases and they are "no Court inferior to that of a, Magistrate of the 2nd class. The cases were tried by the Magistrate of the first class, Mendar. The learned Sessions Judges argument is that under section 260, Criminal Procedure Code, a Magistrate has to be specially empowered for trying cases summarily and that the Magistrate who tried these cases was not so specially empowered. There is a fallacy in this argument. Every Magistrate is not required to be specially empowered to try cases summarily ; nor does section 260 govern offences under the Motor Vehicles Act. Section 260, Criminal Procedure Code, enumerates the kind of cases that have to be tried summarily. Offences under the Motor Vehic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.