SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(J&K) 72

O.P.SHARMA
State Of J. &K. – Appellant
Versus
Ravi Chand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: P.C. Sharma
Advocate For Respondent: Sakal Bhushan

1. The only question involved in this Criminal Revision whether the order releasing the respondents who are facing trial on the charge of murder is an abuse of the process of the court.

2. The facts of the case in brief are these. One Pawan Kumar was killed on 23-11-1997. A Police Challan was produced against the accused-respondents on 09-02-1998 charging them with the murder of said Pawan Kumar. The Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu found them prima facie guilty of murder and framed charges punishable under section 302/149/148/323 RPC against them on 25-09-1998. While the evidence was being recorded, the accused-respondents applied for release on bail. The learned trial court allowed the application by its order dated: 19-05-2000 on the sole and the only ground:-

"That this court in a case S. Ajit Singh Vs. State of J&K, Cr. L.J. 2000 (J&K) 343, has granted bail to the accused because of the delay on the part of prosecution to produce its evidence and the facts being identical, the ratio is applicable."

3. Mr. Sharma, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the State argued that the order of the trial court is illegal because the offence of murder being punishable with death or life i



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top