SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(J&K) 99

SYED BASHIR-UD-DIN
Mohd. Afzal Shah – Appellant
Versus
Gh. Ahmad Shah – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.Y. Bhat
Advocate For Respondent: M.I. Hussain

Revision petitioner/plaintiff filed injuction suit in the court of Munsiff Sub Registrar, Srinagar. Alongwith an application was moved for grant of interim relief in the nature of restraining and injucting the defendants (respondents to the revision ) from interfering with the possession of plaintiff-applicant over the suit property. The initial direction was confirmed subsequently after the otherside filed objections by order June 16, 2003. Defendants filed an appeal against the order. The additional District Judge, Srinagar by order dated 30.9.2003 accepted the appeal and has set aside the order of the court below. Against this order the present revision petition is filed.

On 7.4.2004 during the course of the arguments counsel for the parties in the circumstances referred in the order sought two days time to come with the compromise deed. However, when the matter was taken up on board today the counsel for the parties presented their respective compromise drafts. Strangely, neither counsel accepted nor consented to draft prepared by the other counsel/otherside. having failed to arrive at a settlement/compromise, the matter after concluding the arguments is taken up for final dispo








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top