SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(J&K) 238

S.K.GUPTA
Vijay Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
R. S. Traders – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Rajinder Singh Jamwal

There is delay of 111 days in filing the revision.

After hearing learned counsel for the applicant and having regard to the cause shown in the application, I am satisfied that the delay in filing the revision was neither intentional nor deliberate but on account of the circumstances set out in the application. The application is allowed. Delay in filing the revision is condoned.

Registry is directed to register and number the revision.

Criminal Revision No. /2004.

2. On a complaint filed by the respondent, under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, (hereinafter for short referred to as "the Act") in alleging that the cheque issued by the petitioner for a sum of Rs.25,000/-, in discharge of his debt liability, when presented before the Bank, stood dishonoured and despite making demand by giving a notice in writing by the drawee of the cheque within 15 days from the date of receipt of the information from the Bank that the `account closed, the cheque amount was not paid. The learned Magistrate after recording preliminary evidence took cognizance and issued process against the accused and the accused, after appearing, filed an application seeking dropping of the proceedings on t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top