SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(J&K) 34

A.S.ANAND
Krishan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: T.C. Kotwal
Advocate For Respondent: J.P. Singh

1. Plaintiff-petitioners filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the sale deed dated 11-11-1974 registered on 13-11-1974 and executed by their father in favour of the defendant, in respect of a building situate at Virmarg, Jammu, was null and void being unconscionable and without legal necessity, qua the rights of the plaintiffs. The property, subject matter of the sale, was stated to be ancestral Joint Hindu family property of the plaintiffs and their father. A consequential relief of possession was also sought for by the plaintiffs in the suit. The plaintiffs had valued their suit at Rs. 300/-

2. An objection was raised in the trial court to the effect that the suit had not been properly valued for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction and that the court of Munsiff, Jammu had no jurisdiction to try the suit. The learned trial court framed the following two preliminary issues :-

1. Whether the suit is not properly valued ? If so what is the value of the suit for purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction ? O.P.D.

2. whether me court has no jurisdiction to try the suit?

O. P. D.

3. The trial court decided issue No: 1 in favour of the defendant and held that the suit had not been



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top