SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(J&K) 303

MANSOOR AHMAD MIR
Fayaz Ahmad Kishtwari – Appellant
Versus
Gh. Hassan Bhat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Tassaduq Hussain Khawaja
Advocate For Respondent: M.A. Thakur

1. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court in terms of the mandate of Section 561-A of Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of the proceedings and the order dated 22nd June, 2004 passed by the Ist Class Judicial Magistrate, Chadoora in the complaint titled Ghulam Hassan Bhat Vs. Fayaz Ahmad Kishtwari under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. It appears that respondent, Ghulam Hassan Bhat, filed a complaint under Sections 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the First Class Judicial Magistrate, Chadoora against the accused, petitioner herein, on 18th March, 2003. The Magistrate took the cognizance and issued the process against the accused for the commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

3. It appears that the petitioner/accused appeared before the said court and raised a plea that complaint is not maintainable. The learned Magistrate, after hearing the learned counsel for the complainant and the accused, held that the complaint has been presented after the prescribed period of limitation but in terms of mandate of proviso to Section 142(b) of Negotiable Instrument Act the Court can condone the delay and accordingly



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top