SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(J&K) 369

B.A.KHAN, NIRMAL SINGH
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sham Lal Matoo – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Zainab Shamas Watali
Advocate For Respondent: P.N. Raina

Khan CJ(A)):

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment/order of the State Consumer Protection Commission (for brief "the Commission") allowing the respondents complaint and directing the appellant to pay him Rs.2, 87, 775 with 12 % interest.

2. The respondent had lodged a complaint with the Commission claiming that he owned a residential house in Degam Nagbal, Tehsil Shopian which he had insured with the Appellant Company on 25th March, 1997 under an insurance policy which was valid till 24th May, 1998. He was a migrant and while he was in Jammu he learnt about this house having been destroyed in fire. So he, accordingly, lodged a claim before the Appellant Company which was not settled for one reason or the other and also on the objection that the house in question was jointly owned by him and his brother, Omkar Nath. His further case in the complaint was that his brother had died on 16th March, 1993 and he had taken his daughter in adoption. Moreover, he had taken the insurance policy much after in 1997and that there was no claim from any legal heir of his brother as he had not left behind one.

3. This complaint was resisted by the Appellant Company on several grounds and, pri



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top