SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(J&K) 92

PERMOD KOHLI
Ab. Rashid – Appellant
Versus
Ab. Aziz – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Sunil Sethi
Advocate For Respondent: D.C. Raina
Advocate For Respondent: Vikram Singh

1. This revision arises out of order dated 18-10-2003 passed by the learned District Judge, Kathua reversing the order of Munsiff, Billawar dated 20-2-2003.

2. Briefly stated the facts as emerge from the record are that the present petitioner filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction in the Court of Munsiff, Billawar against the defendants from raising construction over the property comprising Survey Nos 201, 1960, 1965, 2819 situated at village Barota, Tehsil Billawar claiming himself to be co-owner in possession with the defendants.

3. It was alleged that without partition of the property and without the consent of the plaintiff, the defendants are raising construction over the joint land. The defendant contested the suit on the ground that the property was partitioned by oral partition and both the parties are in possession of half of the share. The defendants further stated that one of the defendants is in the process of raising construction of residential house over 3 Marlas of land fallen to their share.

4. The trial Court initially granted ad-interim injunction maintaining status-quo, but subsequently vide order dated 20-2-2003 vacated the order dated 20-8-2002 granting

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top