1. This criminal acquittal appeal is directed against the judgment/order dated 9th May 2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu in a conviction appeal titled as Sohan Lal Koul v. State, whereby and Whereunder the order of conviction and sentence passed by Learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (Sub-Judge), Jammu was set aside and accused came to be acquitted for the commission of offences punishable under sections 304-A and 279 RPC, FIR No. 129/2001, Police Station, Bakshi Nagar, Jammu, which shall be hereinafter referred to as "impugned judgment".

2. Learned counsel for the appellant half heartedly argued that impugned order/judgment is illegal, erroneous and perverse. The order passed by the trial court was legally sound and accused-respondent was rightly convicted and sentenced by the trial court. But the appellate Court has fallen in error while accepting the appeal of respondent-accused.

3. Learned counsel for respondent argued that the impugned order and judgment is legally sound and needs no interference. While developing his arguments he stressly argued that FIR came to be lodged in Police Station Bakshi Nagar for the commission of offences punishable under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document