SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(J&K) 194

NIRMAL SINGH
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Hardeep Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: R.K. Gupta
Advocate For Respondent: Nemo

1. Respondent-Hardeep Singh (complainant) is the owner of Bus No.JK02-E-4285. He got his Bus insured with the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Divisional Office, Gandhi Nagar, Jammu, (hereinafter for short called the Insurance Company) for sum of Rs.5.50.000/- with effect from 17-04-1996 to 16-04-1997. The Bus met with an accident at Kalakot. District Rajouri on 06-01-1997 and the case to this effect was registered with Police Station, Kalakot. Thereafter respondent-Hardeep Singh put up his claim with the Insurance Company. The Surveyor assessed the damages. Petitioner-Insurance Company did not settle the claim of the respondent-Hardeep Singh on the plea that the Driving Licence of the Driver of the offending Bus was not valid.

2. However, respondent-Hardeep Singh (complainant) filed a complaint before the learned Divisional Forum, Jammu, under section 10 of the Jammu & Kashmir Consumers Protection Act, 1987 (for short hereinafter called the Act). Therein the claimant prayed that he be paid Rs.40,000/- as loss/damages occurred to him with interest @ 25% and compensation of Rs.8,000/- for suffering, pains, mental agony and cost of litigation.

3. The learned Divisional Forum Jammu, after r






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top