SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(J&K) 296

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J.
Mohd. Younis Khan - Appellant
Versus
State & Ors. - Respondent
SWP No. 993/2003
Decided On : 06 December, 2006

Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.A. Qadiri
Advocate For Respondent: M. Aijaz

A person who enters the service by fraud cannot claim rights to salary or pension benefits. Equity cannot bend the arms of the law for an individual who acquired a status by practicing fraud.

Headnote:

Fraudulent Entry - Forest Protection Guard - [Forest Act, Section 8] - The court dismissed the writ petition seeking release of withheld salary, as the petitioner obtained entry into the department by fraudulent, fake, and forged order. The court cited precedents to establish that a person who enters the service by fraud cannot claim rights to salary or pension benefits. The court also emphasized that equity cannot bend the arms of the law for an individual who acquired a status by practicing fraud.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was appointed as a Forest Protection Guard but his salary was withheld due to suspicions of fraudulent entry. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking the release of withheld salary.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that a person who plays fraud cannot invoke the writ jurisdiction to seek direction to release salary. The court also emphasized the duty to ensure that public money is not wasted.

Issues: Fraudulent entry into the department, release of withheld salary, and applicability of writ jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that a person who enters the service by fraud cannot claim rights to salary or pension benefits. The court also emphasized that equity cannot bend the arms of the law for an individual who acquired a status by practicing fraud.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and all connected CMP(s) were also dismissed. Any interim direction was vacated.

1. It is averred in this petition that petitioner came to be appointed vide order No.8 of 1997 dated 10.7.1997 against the post of Forest Protection Guard in the grade of Rs.950-1400 plus usual allowances. He joined and came to be posted with Deputy Director, Forest Protection, Srinagar, in terms of annexure-P3. Thereafter, he was deputed for obtaining training vide order No.65 of 1997 dated 09.10.1997 and directed to report to Principal, Forest Training School at Chatternar Bandipora. Petitioner is figuring at sr. No.7 in the said order. He reported Principal, Forest Training School and undergone the basic training course. Respondent No.2 issued order No.927-34/L/I/99 dated 31.05.1999 in which he is figuring at sr. No.40 whereby and whereunder the employees figuring in annexures A and B were repatriated back to the Forest Department along with posts-anneuxre P6. Petitioner made representation which came to be allowed and accordingly respondent No.3 posted the petitioner at Sindh Forest Division. Thereafter, salary of petitioner came to be stopped without assigning any reasons. Petitioner approached respondents for release of salary but no satisfactory reply was given by them for withholding the salary which constrained the petitioner to file this writ petition and sought writ of certiorari quashing the impugned communication No.CCF(K)Estt/2003/241/45 dated 15.01.2003 issued by respondent No.3 and commanding the respondents to release the withhold salary.

2. Respondents appeared and filed reply. It is profitable to reproduce the relevant portion of the reply herein, which read as under:

(ii) That the respondents received a complaint to one Mohd. Afzal Mir and while verifying the relevant orders it was found that petitioner alongwith some other persons has been shown to have been promoted on transfer to Forest Protection Force while-as the petitioner was not figuring in the promotion order issued by the department whereby Class-IV officials of Forest Department were promoted on transfer to Forest Protection Force. On examination of the relevant record it was found that petitioner has not been promoted by the Forest Department nor he was Class-IV of the Forest department, as such, for all practical purposes petitioner has entered the department fraudulently.

(iii) That the petitioner came to know about the said fact, he claimed that he has been appointed in the Forest Protection Force as Forest Protection Guard and has not been appointed in the Forest Deptt nor stands promoted to the post of Forest Protection Guard. The petitioner accordingly was directed to produce the original copy of appointment order as Forest Protection Guard and till the time the appointment order is authenticated, the salary of the petitioner was stopped. The petitioner was again communicated vide No.401-04/E dated 25.1.2003 to produce the original initial appointment order as Forest Protection Guard. Copy of the said communication is placed on record with this reply as Annexure B. In response to the said communication the petitioner submitted that said order is lying with his brother who is outside the state and same will be submitted on his return. Copy of the said reply submitted by the petitioner is placed on record as Annexure C hereto.

(iv) That petitioner was again communicated by virtue of communication No.3428-31/E dated 14.5.2003 to produce the original appointment order as Forest Protection Guard. Copy of the said communication is placed on record with this reply as Annexure D. The petitioner till date has not produced the original appointment order as Forest Protection Guard. The respondents on verification of official records pertaining to the alleged appointment order of the petitioner which also forms Annexure P2 to the writ petition, have found that no original signed copy is available in the official records. It is pertinent to mention here that direct appointment to the post of Forest Protection Guard are made by selection by Services Select


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top