J.P.SINGH
Azad Ali Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
2. S. Omkar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, while referring to the grounds of detention and the provisions of Section-8 and 13 of the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 urged that the detention of the petitioner was liable to be quashed as the grounds, though vague and ambiguous, were not served upon the detenu alongwith the material supporting the grounds. District Magistrate, Anantnag has issued the impugned detention order in a mechanical manner and without application of mind, urges the counsel.
3. Shri M.A. Beigh, learned Dy. Advocate General, produced the detention records and supported the order of District Magistrate, Anantnag, saying that the activities of the petitioner were such which could not have been prevented except by exercise of powers under Section-8 of the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and gone through the dete
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.