IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
J.P. Singh, J.
Azad Ali Khan - Appellant
Versus
State & Ors. - Respondent
HCP No. 359/2006
Decided On : 06 November, 2006
Detention - J&K Public Safety Act - Section 8, Section 13 - The court discussed the provisions of Section-8 and 13 of the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 and highlighted the non-application of mind by the District Magistrate in exercising power under Section-8. The court emphasized the importance of recording satisfaction based on existing material and after due application of mind, and the right of the detainee to be supplied with the copies of the FIRs and incriminating evidence for effective representation under Section-13. The court quashed the detention order as it violated Section-8 of the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 and Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought the quashing of a detention order issued under section-8 of the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978, on the grounds of non-application of mind by the District Magistrate and non-supply of material for effective representation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the detention order had been passed mechanically and without application of mind, and the petitioner was not supplied with the copies of the FIRs or the incriminating evidence for effective representation.
Issues: The issues revolved around the non-application of mind in exercising power under Section-8, and the non-supply of material for effective representation under Section-13 of the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of recording satisfaction based on existing material and after due application of mind, and the right of the detainee to be supplied with the copies of the FIRs and incriminating evidence for effective representation under Section-13.
Final Decision: The court quashed the detention order as it violated Section-8 of the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 and Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India, and directed the release of the petitioner forthwith from custody.
2. S. Omkar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, while referring to the grounds of detention and the provisions of Section-8 and 13 of the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 urged that the detention of the petitioner was liable to be quashed as the grounds, though vague and ambiguous, were not served upon the detenu alongwith the material supporting the grounds. District Magistrate, Anantnag has issued the impugned detention order in a mechanical manner and without application of mind, urges the counsel.
3. Shri M.A. Beigh, learned Dy. Advocate General, produced the detention records and supported the order of District Magistrate, Anantnag, saying that the activities of the petitioner were such which could not have been prevented except by exercise of powers under Section-8 of the J&K Public Safety Act, 1978. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and gone through the detention records.
4. Before dealing with the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, reference to the dossier and grounds of detention becomes necessary. Dossier sent by Senior Superintendent of Police, Anantnag and the grounds of detention recorded by the District Magistrate reads thus:--
"DOSSIER IN RESPECT OF:-
Name: Azad Ali Khan
S/o: Gull Ali Khan
Residence: Kahribal
Tehsil: Anantnag
District: Anantnag
Age: 28 years.
The subject namely Azad Ali Khan Gull Ali Khan R/o Kharibal Tehsil Anantnag District Anantnag is a permanent resident of J&K State. His age is about 28 years. He is a labour by his profession. His educational qualification is 9th pass.
The subject namely Azad Ali Khan Gull Ali Khan R/o Kharibal Tehsil Anantnag District Anantnag is a notorious one and is clandestinely dealing in illicit timber. He has been actively engaged in transporting/concealing and keeping of smuggling timber. The individual is very much bent upon ruin the economy of whole nation especially the economy of state. His activities very adversely effect the state exchequers and deleterious of living creature.
As per interrogation report narration the subject is resident of Kharibal and is born and brought up said village. Being unemployed the subject could not find any job except timer smuggling and in the shade of timber smuggling he gained a lot in the shape of moveable/immovable property.
As per discreet report the subject is very much active timber smuggling since from last ten (10) years. The subject is served and took away with the green fold from the forests area and sell it on his rates for earning wrongful gains surrounding the neighborhood village. Every legitimate effort taken to prevent the individual from such notorious, nefarious and smuggling activities but all proved in vain.
The individual not lonely comments forest offence but his deep links with high associates who are habitual in commenting the offence as enumerated in Forest Act and corroborative sections of RPC. As per report the subject is very much habitual offender though still at the threshold of its life journey.
Forest are national wealth and main source of income of state and their protection is to be ensured at all costs. It constitutes prime parameters of the environment and contribute to maintaining the order all ecological balance also occupy the important place in the economy development. The value of Kashmir will lose its magic of beauty if the forests are not protected. It is obligatory up on law enforcing agencies to eradicate the menace of timber smuggling and book the culprits under relevant laws so save the valuable treasures. Great spiritual Kashmir saint Alamdari-Kashmir (RAH) rightly said UN POSH TELI YALI WAN POSH.
The individual as per interrogation report and incriminating evidence
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.