J.P.SINGH
Bawa Sewa Nand Chela Shanker Giri Mohatamim Mahavirji Maharaj Temple, Thandhar – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent
2. There is no dispute between the parties that the Temple was constructed in late sixties. They, however, dispute as to who had constructed it. The petitioner, Sadhu, claims it to have been constructed by him with the financial assistance provided to him by Chenani Hydel Power Project. The respondents, however, say that the Temple had been constructed by the villagers.
3. The records on the file, however, demonstrate that the land on which the Temple had been constructed and the other land appertenant thereto and in possession of the Temple, is owned neither by the petitioner nor by the villagers. It, on the other hand, vests in the State and is recorded as State-land.
4. Deputy Commissioner, Udhampur, on the request of Bawa Seva Nand Giri, the writ petitioner, and on the recommendation of Tehsildar Chenani
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.