2007 Supreme(J&K) 35
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J.
Indumeet Singh - Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K & Ors. - Respondent
SWP No. 1662/2006
Decided On : 29 March, 2007
Advocate For Appellant: Z.A. Qureshi
Advocate For Respondent: Jehangir Iqbal Ganai
The Vice President had the authority to make emergent decisions and implement them, and the Joint Secretaries could only perform routine business with the approval of the Vice President.
Headnote:
Secretary - Powers of Vice President to pass interim order - Rules 1, 5, 6, 7, 12, 14, 19 - The court discussed the relevant provisions of the Rules, including the composition of the Council, the election of the Secretary, and the powers of the Standing Committee and Vice President. The court highlighted the authority of the Vice President to make emergent decisions and implement them, as well as the limitations on the functions of the Joint Secretaries.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged an order passed by the Vice President of the J&K State Sports Council, appointing the present Director to hold the charge of the Secretary of the Council. The petitioner argued that the Vice President was not competent to pass the order and that the post of Secretary should have been filled through elections as per the Rules.
Finding of the Court:
The court decided that the Vice President had the powers to pass the interim order and appoint the present Director to hold the charge of the Secretary. The court also directed the respondents to conduct elections for the post of Secretary within one month.
Issues: The main issue was whether the Vice President had the powers to pass the impugned order appointing the present Director to hold the charge of the Secretary.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Vice President had the authority to make emergent decisions and implement them, and that the Joint Secretaries could only perform routine business with the approval of the Vice President.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, the interim direction was vacated, and the respondents were directed to conduct elections for the post of Secretary of the Council within one month.
2. During pendency of the writ petition, this court vide order dated 03-02-2007 restrained Ravinder Gupta, present Secretary from operating upon the funds of the Council.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the Secretary of the Council namely Mr. Manoj Pant (IFS), the then Director of the Council, was a member of the Council and was also nominated Secretary of the Council. He continues to be the Secretary even through he has been transferred. Thus respondent No. 3 -- Vice President was not competent to pass the impugned order and empower Shri Ravinder Gupta, present Director of the Council to hold the charge of the office of Secretary of the Council. In the alternative he argued that even if the post of Secretary of the Council had fallen vacant, the Secretary was to be elected from the members of the Council in terms of the Rules and Regulations of the Jammu and Kashmir State Sports Council (for short Rules). He further argued that Council is having two Joint Secretaries as per Rules, the vice President could have asked one of the Joint Secretary to perform the duties and functions of the Secretary till elections.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents argued that the then Secretary of the Council Shri Pant, IF A, was posted as Director of the Council, came to be nominated as member of the Council vide Government order No. 46-Edu (Tech) of 2005 dated 24-03-2005 and elected as Secretary of the council. By his transfer, the post of Secretary had fallen vacant because he ceased to be the member of the Council. Further he argued that Manoj Pant had made a written request that he has been transferred and he is no longer member of the Council and could not hold the charge of the Secretary of the Council and had sought instructions to whom he would hand over the charge of the Secretary of the Council. Accordingly Government passed order No. 788-GAD of 2006 dated 24-06-2006, impugned in this petition. Shri Pant is not aggrieved of the said order. Ravinder Gupta, Director Youth Services and Sports is performing the duties right from 25-06-2006. However, after lapse of six months, petitioner challenged the order on the ground that the same is against the Rules.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents argued that the petitioner has no right or locus to challenge the order. While defending the impugned order, he argued that the impugned order is just an interim arrangement till elections are held and Vice President is within his powers to make such orders in order to run the affairs of the Council, because he has the power to preside over the meetings of the Standing Committee, to exercise powers to take emergent decision(s) and to implement and carry out the decision(s) in terms of the mandate of Rule 19 of the Rules.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Admit. With the consensus of learned counsel for the parties, the case is taken up for final disposal.
7. At the outset it is apt to mention here that I deem it proper not to thrash out and determine as to whether petitioner has locus to challenge the impugned order, but to decide the issue that whether respondent No. 2 has the powers and jurisdiction to pass the impugned order.
8. The sole question which calls for determination is whether Vice President -- respondent No. 2 was having powers to pass the impugned order. In order to reply this question, it is necessary to notice relevant provisions of the Rules.
Sub-rule (c) of Rule 1 defines Council -- Standing Committee -- member. It is profitable to reproduce sub-rule
a) x x x x x x x x x x x
c) Council" shall mean the Jammu and Kashmir State Sports Council.
x x x x x x x x x x
h) "St