1. One Lateef Ahmad Sheikh died while working as class IV employee in education department leaving behind petitioner, his unmarried sister and respondents 8 and 9, the widow and minor son. With their agreement the petitioner was appointed on compassionate grounds under SRO 43 of 1994 in his place who later got married and settled with her husband whereafter reportedly she stopped sharing her Salary with respondents 8 and 9 who accordingly complained before official respondents who in turn decided deducting half of petitioners salary for payment to respondents 8 and 9 till conclusion of enquiry reportedly initiated in the matter.

2. Aggrieved thereby the petitioner challenges the decision as reflected in impugned communications No. 480-84/SM/AC dated. 27.07.2006, No. 636-39/SM/AC dated 15.09.2006, No. 732-35/SM/AC dated 11.10.2006 and No. 766-69/SM/AC dated 11.11.2006 as being violative of the terms/conditions of her appointment on the ground that no such deduction could be ordered and seeks their quashment accordingly. The stand of private respondents 8 and 9 as projected by their counsel during threshold submissions of course without filing any written objections is that being depe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document