SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(J&K) 25

S.K.GUPTA
Darshan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Sain Dass – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.L. Gupta
Advocate For Respondent: Karanjeet Singh

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also gone through the record.

2. By means of present petition, prayer for quashing the proceedings initialed before Executive Magistrate, Tehsildar. Bishnah under Section 145 Cr. PC and setting aside orders dated: 17-08-2000 passed by Executive Magistrate, Tehsildar. Bishnah and 13-10-2001 by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge Jammu has been made. Before appreciating the rival contentions of the parties, brief facts need to be noticed, which are to the following effect.

3. The petitioner, Darshan Lal and Respondent-1 and 2, Sain Dass and Dass Ram, happened to be real brothers. The land aggregating 21 kanals situated at village Pindi Charkan Kalan, Teshil Bishnah contained in khasra Nos, 900. 960, 963. 974. 923. 961, 922. 924, 967, stood allotted to their father and thereafter ownership rights were also conferred upon their father. Their father, however, bequeathed the entire land in favour of the petitioner by executing a with. After the death of the father, petitioner. Darshan Lal, stepped into his shoes on the strength of a will and allegedly was in cultivating possession of the said land. A dispute will) regard to the said land crept up bet






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top