PER T.S. DOABIA-J (ORAL)

1. The appellant submits that he was performing the duties of Works Supervisor and should have been regularised as such. It is submitted even though he was working as Works Supervisor, he came to be regularised as Helper. The fact that the appellant was supposed to perform the duties of Works Supervisor on daily wage basis, was noticed by the learned Single Judge. This is so noticed in the opening para of the judgment. For facility of reference, this paragraph is reproduced below:-

The petitioner got engaged on 1st of December 1988 as a Casual Worker on daily wage basis. This was done by the competent authority of the department of Public Works. District Budgam. The District Superintending Engineer, PWD. District Budgam directed, vide his No. 7665-66 dated: 28-09-1988, the petitioner to work as a Works Supervisor on daily wage basis."

2. As indicated above, the appellant/writ petitioner, came to be regularised as a helper. He came to this Court. He wanted to be regularised as Works Supervisor. This plea of his stands rejected. He has preferred this appeal.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant placed reliance on a decision given by the Division Bench of this Cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document