JANKI NATH BHAT
Punnu Mal – Appellant
Versus
Durga Singh – Respondent
(2) The facts giving rise to this suit are that the plaintiff brought the suit against the defendant with . the allegation that the defendant took on rent the suit house at Rs. 12 a month from 1st Baisakh 1997 by means of a rent deed with its previous owner S. D Chopra. Later on the rent was increased to Rs 17 a month. The plaintiff who comes from Maluchak on the border was uprooted from that place in the year 1947 and started a small shop in the city of Jammu. He has since the partition of India been living in Jammu in a rented house. The landlord of that house had served a notice of ejectment upon him. On 12th March 63 the plaintiff purchased the house for Rs. 13000. He does not own any other house. He sent a number of notices to the defendant The notices were not served upon him as he evaded service. Then another notice was got affixed on the outer door of his residence. Hence the suit for ejectment.
(3) T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.