SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(J&K) 84

G.A.KUCHHAI
Dilshada Bano – Appellant
Versus
Gh. Nabi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: G.N. Hagroo
Advocate For Respondent: J.N. Langar

1. This application under Order 33 CPC is by the applicant against the respondent her husband to sue in forma pauperis for recovery of property and money mentioned in the application.

2. The applicant, has pleaded being wedded wife of the respondent, who has turned her out for not satisfying his demand for additional dowery. She having no sufficient means to defer the expenses of court fees on her claim of Rs. 1,54,874/-having to feed her children in the house of her parents and having no means. Therefore, seeking declaration to sue as an indigent person. The applicant has filed schedule of the property alongwith the application supported by an affidavit.

3. The respondent ultimately appeared and filed his objections to the application for declaring the applicant as an indigent person objecting to the maintainability of the applicaition, same being in accordance with law and the applicant being a Govt. servant receiving a salary of Rs. 1000/-having G.P. Fund, Insurance and capacity to pay the requisite court fee. That the applicant has suppressed the true facts in the application and her claim is based on incorrect facts. Further the application and list has not been properly verifie





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top