SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(J&K) 6

MAZHAR ALI SHAH, M.L.BHAT
Inderjit Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: U.K. Jalali

PER BHAT J

1. Encouraged by the wording of rule 148 of the J&K High Court Rules of 1975, the petitioner has filed this petition seeking to quash the order of the Deputy Registrar of this court and praying for direction for supply of translated copies of judicial record and for directing the deputy Registrar not to list petitions of 1980 and 1982 till the petitioner is supplied English translation of Urdu documents from the judicial record.

2. It appears that civil revision petitions nos. 89/80/80/82 and 139/86 titled Inderjeet Gupta Vs. Bakshi Vishwamiter/Subash Dutt are pending disposal in this court. The petitioner seems to have made an application for supply of English translation of Urdu documents which are said to be part of judicial record of the original file of the trial court out of which the three revision petitions have arisen. The urdu documents, translation whereof is sought on payment of fee, are detailed out in the application and stamp duty is also paid to the deputy Registrar. The Deputy Registrar of this court on perusal of office reported has noted as under on the said application:

"It appears that at present there is no translating facility available in the copying















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top