T.S.DOABIA
Avtar Krishan – Appellant
Versus
Rattan Lal Gondi – Respondent
1. The plaintiff/ petitioner filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction. The prayer made was that defendant/ respondent be restrained from interfering in any manner into the peaceful possession of the plaintiff/ petitioner over a shop situated at Peer Mitha. Jammu. The description of these premises are given in the heading of the plaint.
2. In para 5 of the plaintiff it is submitted that the plaintiff has become owner by adverse possession. Alongwith the suit an application has been filed. In this a prayer has been made that the plaintiff be permitted to repair the said premises. It is stated that the roof alongwith backwall of the suit shop is in a dilapidated condition and is likely to collapse at any time. This application was filed on 3-3-1998. The respondent/defendant filed the written statement. The plea taken by him is that the plaintiff was inducted in the premises by one Ravinder Kumar. It is submitted that the plaintiff is a sub-lesser and therefore, he has no legal right to continue in the premises. It is also submitted that the defendant would be taking steps with a view to recover the possession by restoring to the provisions under the J&K Houses and Shop
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.