JANKI NATH BHAT
Timber Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Chandu Lal – Respondent
It appears that when the suit was instituted in the court of the Sub-judge, the defendant moved the District Judge Jammu for transfer of the suit from that court. The transfer application was rejected by the District Judge as would appear from the interlocutory order of 24-8-62 in the suit. On 22-9-62, the next hearing of the case, the defendant wanted time for filing his written statement. Three adjournments were granted to the defendant to file his written statement. On 14-11-62 the trial judge was on leave. Three more adjournments were granted to the defendant on payment of nominal costs to file his written statement. Ultimately the defendant filed his written statement on 7-6-63 when the learned Judge issued warrants of attachment for recovery of Rs. 20 costs awarded on the previous hearings. On 7-6-63 the judge further ordered the parties to produce their documents on 18-7-6
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.