SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(J&K) 55

T.S.DOABIA
District Manager, Telecom – Appellant
Versus
M. L. Raina – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: S. Bhat
Advocate For Respondent: M.L. Raina

The above two writ petitions dealing with the same subject-matter are disposed of vide this common judgment.

2. A complaint was filed by the complainant-respondent before the Divisional Forum with regard to Telephone No. 30436. It was stated that the bill for Rs. 30,613, is on the higher side. The fact that the petitioner department had allowed a rebate of Rs. 28,600/- and called upon the respondent to deposit the remaining amount, was challenged before the Divisional Forum. It was stated that the telephone has no STD facility, and therefore, the question of such a high bill being issued was not Justified. The above was the issue in complaint No. 2409, filed before the Divisional Forum. In the second complaint bearing No. 2410, the complaint was with regard to a bill amounting to Rs. 21,650/- for the same telephone. In addition to the prayer that the amount be reduced, a further prayer was made that the complainant be paid compensation. The complaints were entertained. The amount of both the bills was reduced to Rs. 650/-in each bill including rent but excluding trunk calls. The department has been directed to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. 10,000. This is for harrasement and


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top