S.M.RIZVI
Noor-ud-Din Shah – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent
2. No reply affidavit was filed on behalf of the respondents despite numerous opportunities given to Additional Advocate General in this behalf, and therefore, the factual allegations made in the petition have remained un-rebutted
3. It may be mentioned here that this petition was dismissed by a learned Single Bench of this Court on 3-9-1987 on some technical grounds, and that decision was later on set aside, by a Division Bench of this Court in LPA No: 8 of 1987, and that is how the case has again come up for adjudication.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner has argued only two legal points to assail the impugned order of detention, which, according to him, are sufficient for quashing of the same.
5. Firstly, he argued that the detaining authority has re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.