SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(J&K) 133

G.A.KUCHHAI
Mohinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harbans Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: A.K. Malik
Advocate For Respondent: K.N. Bhat

1. This civil second appeal by the plaintiffs/Appellants is against the decision dated 21-12-1976 passed by District Judge, Baramulla, in an appeal, against the judgment and decree dated 29-9-1975 passed by Sub-Judge, Baramulla, decreeing the suit under Right of Prior Purchase Act.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are: that in exercise of right of prior purchase, the appellants/plaintiffs brought a suit against the defendants/respondents for possession of 19 marlas of land under survey No : 366 khewat No 2 situated at village Tangmulla Tehsil Sopore. The trial court Sub Judge, Baramulla decreed the suit with condition to the appellants/plaintiffs to deposit purchase money ascertained during trial by 1-11-1975, which had been disputed by the appellants. The appellants, filed civil first appeal before the District Judge, Baramulla on the sole point on wrong determination of purchase money. The District Judge, Baramulla, vide his judgment indicated dismissed the appeal and it is against this judgment and decree the plaintiffs/appellants have come in second appeal before this court agitating two points: firstly

i) wrongly confirming finding of the trial court regarding market val
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top