BILAL NAZKI
Prem Lata Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Nath Sharma – Respondent
The summons were issued and one Mr. Vinod Abrol appeared for State Financial Corporation, Jammu. When his statement was being recorded, questions were asked by the plaintiff counsel regarding a loan transaction between the State Financial Corporation and the plaintiff for grant of loan of Rs. 12 Lakhs. The witness deposed that mortgage deed for ensuring the repayment of loan was executed between the State Financial Corporation and the plaintiff in January, 1984. He deposed before the court that he has brought the original mortgage deed. This was objected to by the learned counsel for the defendants. The learned counsel for the parties thereof sought time to argue the matter.
The learned Judge after hearing the arguments came to the conclusion that the witnesses can be allowed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.