SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(J&K) 67

BILAL NAZKI
Prem Lata Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Nath Sharma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: C.S. Gupta
Advocate For Respondent: S.D. Sharma

Two suits are being tried together before the City Judge (Sub Judge), Jammu. One Mr. Vinod Abrol, Law Officer, State Financial Corporation, J&K, Jammu, appeared as witness. The list of witnesses given earlier by the plaintiff had showed one witness as, "Concerned Clerk, State Financial Corporation with record of loan, mortgage deed including all documents pertaining to Shandy Hotel, Bankey Behari Market, Jammu.

The summons were issued and one Mr. Vinod Abrol appeared for State Financial Corporation, Jammu. When his statement was being recorded, questions were asked by the plaintiff counsel regarding a loan transaction between the State Financial Corporation and the plaintiff for grant of loan of Rs. 12 Lakhs. The witness deposed that mortgage deed for ensuring the repayment of loan was executed between the State Financial Corporation and the plaintiff in January, 1984. He deposed before the court that he has brought the original mortgage deed. This was objected to by the learned counsel for the defendants. The learned counsel for the parties thereof sought time to argue the matter.

The learned Judge after hearing the arguments came to the conclusion that the witnesses can be allowed







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top