SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(J&K) 117

NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, VIRENDER SINGH
NGOs Coordination Fed – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: R.A. Jan

Per Kakru, J.

1. Being aggrieved of re-appointment of the respondent No. 4 as Vice Chancellor of the Sher-I-Kashmir University of Agricultural Science & Technology of Kashmir, interference of the Writ Court was sought by the Writ petitioner-Appellant on the ground of non adherence to the rules, prescribing the mode and method of appointment of the Vice Chancellor, enshrined in sub section (1) of section 25 of the Sher-I-Kashmir Universities of Agriculture Scientists and Technology Act 1982 (Act hereinafter), but in the face of the interpretation, placed by the Writ Court, that the procedure contained in sub section (1) is not applicable to the reappointment of the Vice Chancellor, the attempt made by the writ petitioner to persuade the Writ Court, to quash the order of reappointment of the Vice Chancellor, proved futile, resultantly, dismissal of writ petition in limine, hence this Letters Patent Appeal, alleging error of judgment to the learned Single Judge, founded on irrefutable fact that the reappointment of the Vice Chancellor has been made without seeking the panel of eminent agricultural/veterinary scientists from the Selection Committee in terms of sub section (1) of Section

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top