SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(J&K) 162

J.P.SINGH
Fateh Din – Appellant
Versus
Noor Hussain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: P.N. Bhat
Advocate For Respondent: G.R. Asghar

1. Claiming to be the legal heirs of one Resham Bibi who had been allotted land measuring fourteen kanals and five marlas comprised in Survey No.1440 of Village Dara Dullian, Poonch, the petitioners have filed this writ petition questioning Noor Hussain-respondent No.1s right to the restoration of seven kanals of land out of the aforesaid land allotted to Mst. Resham Bibi.

2. Petitioners short submission as projected by their counsel Mr. P.N.Bhat is that the authorities under the Jammu and Kashmir State Evacuees (Administration of Property) Act, Svt. 2006 had erred in omitting to consider the effect of the first proviso appended to Section 14 of the Act, on respondent No.1s application seeking restoration of property, which application had not been supported by the requisite CERTIFICATE from the Government to the effect that Evacuee Property be so restored to the respondents.

3. Mr. G.R.Asghar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 Noor Hussain, while supporting the orders of the sub-ordinate officers and the Jammu and Kashmir Special Tribunal urged that petitioners plea was technical in nature and having been raised for the first time before the Jammu and Kashmir Special Tri




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top