J.P.SINGH
Fateh Din – Appellant
Versus
Noor Hussain – Respondent
2. Petitioners short submission as projected by their counsel Mr. P.N.Bhat is that the authorities under the Jammu and Kashmir State Evacuees (Administration of Property) Act, Svt. 2006 had erred in omitting to consider the effect of the first proviso appended to Section 14 of the Act, on respondent No.1s application seeking restoration of property, which application had not been supported by the requisite CERTIFICATE from the Government to the effect that Evacuee Property be so restored to the respondents.
3. Mr. G.R.Asghar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 Noor Hussain, while supporting the orders of the sub-ordinate officers and the Jammu and Kashmir Special Tribunal urged that petitioners plea was technical in nature and having been raised for the first time before the Jammu and Kashmir Special Tri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.